Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis
- Hits: 352
Evaluation of Aqueductal Stenosis by 3D Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions Sequence: Preliminary Results with 3T MR Imaging
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnosis of AS and periaqueductal abnormalities by routine MR imag- ing sequences is challenging for neuroradiologists. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of the 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM in patients with suspected AS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-MRI and 3D-SPACE images were obtained in 21 patients who had hydrocephalus on routine MR imaging scans and had clinical suspicion of AS, as well as in 12 control subjects. Aqueductal patency was visually scored (grade 0, normal; grade 1, partial obstruction; grade 2, complete stenosis) by 2 experienced radiologists on PC-MRI (plus routine T1-weighted and T2- weighted images) and 3D-SPACE images. Two separate scores were statistically compared with each other as well as with the consensus scores obtained from general agreement of both radiologists.
RESULTS: Therewasanexcellentcorrelationbetween3D-SPACEandPC-MRIscores(0.828).The correlation between 3D-SPACE scorings and consensus-based scorings was higher compared with the correlation between PC-MRI and consensus-based scorings (r 1, P .001 and r 0.966, P .001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM alone can be used for adequate and successful evaluation of the aqueductal patency without the need for additional sequences and examinations. Noninvasive evaluation of the whole cranium is possible in a short time with high resolution by using 3D-SPACE.
In most patients, MR imaging plays a pivotal role in plan- ning the surgical procedure (such as ventriculoperitoneal shunt, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or endoscopic aqua- ductoplasty).3,6,7 With the advent of 3T MR imaging systems, there has been a marked increase in the SNR of images, result- ing in improvement of the image quality and spatial resolution and shortening of the scanning times.8 On the other hand, the main disadvantage of 3T MR imaging systems is their high SAR, which could be eliminated by recently developed ap- proaches such as the 3D-SPACE technique.9,10 Moreover, us- ing a different flip angle–mode technique at 3T can provide 3D images that can evaluate the whole cranium by shortening the acquisition time.8 T1-weighted, proton-density weighted, FLAIR, conventional, and/or heavily T2-weighted MR images can be obtained with a high SNR value in a short time and with a low specific absorption rate value with 3D-SPACE.10 Isotro- pic 3D acquisitions with high spatial resolution have an im- portant advantage for the evaluation of intracranial complex structures.11,12
Our previous experience in animal studies with VFAM in- stead of a constant flip angle mode in T2-weighted 3D-SPACE sequences revealed a better assessment of CSF flow dynamics as well as a better understanding of the aqueductal patency and definition of the accompanying abnormalities.13 Our aim in
ABBREVIATIONS: 3D-CISS 3D constructive interference in steady state; 3D-SPACE 3D sam- pling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions; AS aqueductal stenosis; CE-MRC contrast-enhanced MR cisternography; GRAPPA generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition; MPRAGE magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo; PC phase-contrast cine; VFAM variant flip angle mode
AS is the most common cause of the obstructive hydro- 1
cephalus. The etiology of AS is frequently idiopathic, but in some patients, X-linked recessive inheritance has been re- ported.2,3 Webbing, adhesion, or aqueductal forking can be listed among etiologic factors of primary non-neoplastic AS.4 Periaqueductal lesions (such as cysts, tumors, infections) can lead to aqueductal stenosis as well.2,3 There is no worldwide accepted MR imaging protocol for the evaluation of patients with a preliminary diagnosis of AS; hence, it is usually difficult to clearly define the etiology of hydrocephalus by using rou- tine MR images.3,5 Moreover, invasive techniques (ie, con- trast-enhanced cisternography and/or ventriculographic studies) are required for an accurate diagnosis, and this re- quirement can easily delay the patient management, increase the cost, and lead to serious complications including death.3,6
Received June 19, 2011; accepted after revision July 13.
From Department of Radiology (O.A.), Atatu ̈rk Training and Research Hospital, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey; and National Cancer Institute (B.T.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 06800.
This study was presented as a scientific poster presentation at the 16th Turkish Society of Magnetic Resonance Annual Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey, May 19–21, 2011.
740 Algin AJNR 33 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org
Table 1: The demographic and clinical characteristics and MRI scores of the patient group
Age Consensus No. Sex (yr) PC-MRI SPACE Results
Additional EH Illness
this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of T2- weighted 3D-SPACE with VFAM acquisition in the evaluation of aqueductal patency on a 3T MR imaging system. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous report in the literature regarding the role of this new sequence in the assessment of aqueductal patency as well as in obstructive hydrocephalus.
Materials and Methods
This institutional review board–approved Health Insurance Portabil- ity and Accountability Act– compliant study included 28 patients who were referred to our radiology clinic for MR imaging evaluation for hydrocephalus and clinical or radiological suspicion AS between Jan- uary 2010 and March 2011. Four patients were excluded because their PC-MRI examinations were not evaluable due to technical insuffi- ciency, and 3 patients were excluded due to significant motion arti- facts obscuring scan evaluation. The final study population included 21 patients (13 males, 8 females; mean, 34 5 years of age; range, 7–69 years), whereas the control group included 12 healthy volun- teers (6 females, 6 males; mean, 32 5 years of age; range, 9–64 years).
MR Imaging Protocol
All MR imaging examinations were performed at a 3T MR imaging system (Trio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by using an 8-channel
- 1 M 7 2 2
- 2 F 61 0 0
- 3 M 59 0 0
- 4 M 18 0 0
- 5 F 69 0 0
- 6 F 57 0 0
- 7 F 63 0 0
- 8 M 69 0 0
- 9 M 27 2 2
- 10 F 50 2 2
- 12 M 35 1 1
- 13 M 25 2 2
- 14 F 54 0 0
- 15 M 62 0 0
- 17 M 24 0 0 0
- 18 M 46 0 0 0
- 19 F 43 2 1 1
- 20 M 21 0 0 0
- 21 M 9 2 2 2
Idiopathic NF-1 Idiopathic – Web – Idiopathic – Web, gliosis NF-1
Note:—DWM indicates Dandy-Walker malformation; FVOO, fourth ventricular outlet ob- struction; TVAC, third ventricular arachnoid cyst; CoH, complex hydrocephalus; NF-1, neurofibromatosis type 1; EH, etiology of hydrocephalus; TG, tectal glioma.
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Web-synechia NF-1 Idiopathic DWM Idiopathic DWM FVOO – TVAC – CoH DWM Idiopathic – Idiopathic – Web – Web –
1 TG –
2 Idiopathic –
0 FVOO Chiari1 0 Idiopathic –
Fig 1. A 23-year-old woman (control). A, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM image shows a normal aqueduct (grade 0, arrow). B, Thin-section axial reformatted 3D-SPACE with VFAM image demonstrates hypointense flow-void signal intensity consistent with an open aqueduct (arrow). C and D, Sagittal (C ) and axial (D ) PC-MRI are well-matched with 3D-SPACE sequence results (arrows).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:740–46 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org 741
BRAIN ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Table 2: The agreement level in consensus-based scores versus PC-MRI and SPACE scores
Confidence Interval (95%)
Agreement Level (No.) (%)
19 (90.48)a 21 (100)a
NEX, 1; velocity encoding, 6 cm/s. Twenty-four magnitude-phase and rephased images were obtained from every PC-MRI sequence. The PC-MRI sequence image-acquisition time was approximately 5 minutes, though heart rate was a determining factor.
After acquisition of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and PC-MRI, a 3D-SPACE sequence with isotropic voxel size (0.6 0.6 0.6 mm) was obtained in the sagittal plane. Sequence parameters of 3D-SPACE were as follows: TR/TE, 3000/579; FOV, 275 275 mm; NEX, 2; sections per slab, 208; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel ac- quisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; echo spacing, 3.34 ms; turbo factor, 173; section turbo factor, 2; flip angle mode, T2 variant (VFAM); acquisition time, 6.24 minutes.
Volumetric data obtained from 3D T1-weighted and 3D-SPACE sequences was transferred to dedicated workstations (Leonardo, Sie- mens) of the MR imaging unit, and thin-section reformatted (coro- nal, axial, and oblique planes) maximum intensity projection images were achieved.
3D T1-weighted and 3D-SPACE images were evaluated indepen- dently by 2 different experienced radiologists in different worksta- tions with the same display configuration and settings (Leonardo, Siemens). The presence of AS and accompanying findings was re- corded without checking routine T2-weighted and PC-MRI. Aque- ductal patency was scored visually as described below.
Score Zero (AS-Negative). The aqueduct is within normal ranges, and there is no evidence of an intraluminal abnormality. There is a hypointense CSF flow from third ventricle toward the fourth ventricle through the aqueduct.
a The number of times that tests agreed among themselves.
head array coil. All patients and control subjects were scanned in the supine position, and MR imaging protocol parameters are summa- rized below.
After acquisition of scout images, sagittal plane 3D T1-weighted data were obtained by using an MPRAGE sequence (TR/TE/TI, 2300/ 3.15/1000 ms; section thickness, 0.8 mm; voxel size, 0.8 0.8 0.8 mm; FOV, 256 256 mm; NEX, 1; distance factor, 50%; number of sections, 240; flip angle, 8°; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel acquisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; acquisition time, 5.57 min- utes). Then, a 3-plane 2D T2-weighted TSE sequence (TR/TE, 6000/93 ms; section thickness, 3 mm; FOV, 220 220 mm; NEX, 1; distance factor, 30%; flip angle, 120°; parallel acquisition techniques, 2; parallel acquisition techniques mode, GRAPPA; 1.26 minutes) and sagittal-axial plane flow-compensated spoiled gradient-echo PC-MRI technique (2D fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence) with retrospective cardiac gating were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE, 34.9/9.8 ms; FOV, 240 240 mm; section thick- ness, 4 mm; NEX, 2; parallel acquisition techniques, none; section number, 1; flip angle, 10°; section thickness, 4 mm; FOV, 160 mm;
Fig 2. A 35-year-old man with partial aqueductal stenosis (patient 12). A, Sagittal T2-weighted image shows a narrowed aqueduct (arrow). B, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM image clearly demonstrates a prominent hypointense signal intensity in the cerebral aqueduct (arrow). The hypointense signal intensity (also called flow-void sign) on the 3D-SPACE MR image indicates the absence of a complete stenosis. C, Coronal oblique curved reconstructed 3D-SPACE image demonstrates a narrow but open aqueduct (arrow). D and E, Axial (D ) and sagittal (E ) PC-MRI indicate a narrowed but open aqueduct, consistent with partial aqueductal stenosis (arrows).
742 Algin AJNR 33 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org
Fig 3. A 7-year-old boy with a complete aqueductal stenosis and hydrocephalus (patient 1). A, Axial FLAIR image shows a compensated hydrocephalus. B, Sagittal thin-section T1-weighted image demonstrates a narrowed distal aqueduct and a prestenotic aqueductal dilation (arrow). C, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM MR image shows a restricted hyperintense CSF flow proximal to the stenotic segment, whereas the unrestricted flow of CSF distal to the stenosis appears hypointense (arrow). Sagittal (D and E ) and axial (F ) PC-MRI shows a complete aqueductal stenosis, consistent with 3D-SPACE images.
Score One (Partial or Suspected Stenosis). The aqueduct has been narrowed, and/or aqueductal flow is barely visible.
Score Two (AS-Positive). The aqueductal lumen is occluded, and/or there is a dilation in the proximal aqueduct (due to web or adhesion). There is no hypointense flow through the aqueduct on 3D-SPACE images.
Both readers were unblinded to the MR pulse sequence type, and in case of discordance between the scores provided by 2 read- ers, the final decision was determined on a consensus-based evaluation.
Following scoring of 3D-SPACE sequences, both neuroradiolo- gists determined PC-MRI scores. During this evaluation, 3D-SPACE sequences were not included but PC-MRI images were evaluated to- gether with T1-weighted and T2-weighted TSE MR images. After ini- tial evaluations, disagreements about final decisions were resolved by consensus evaluation of the 2 radiologists. During this evaluation, AS patency was scored as described in a prior study.3
Score Zero (AS-Negative). Aqueductal CSF flow is clearly visible on all PC-MRI.
Score One (Partial or Suspected AS). The amount of aqueductal flow is decreased. Aqueductal flow can barely be recognized and can- not be observed during whole cardiac cycles.
Score Two (AS-Positive). CSF flow is not visible on all PC-MRI. After defining the 3D-SPACE and PC-MRI scores according to the above-mentioned information, all sequences were re-evaluated and the consensus-based scores were determined. In this evaluation if there was no AS, the score was 0; if there was a suspicious finding or partial stenosis, the score was 1; and if there was complete AS, the score was recorded as 2. PC-MRI and 3D-SPACE scorings were sta- tistically compared with final consensus scores.
Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, Version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Age values of the patient group were reported with means and SDs. For age values, the concordance of the data to normal distribution was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. An independent-sam- ples t test was performed to compare the values of age variables be- tween sex groups. The agreement level for each type of sequence and consensus-based results was evaluated by using the coefficient, which normally ranges between zero and 1. Zero shows that the cor- relation is a coincidence; a value of 1, on the other hand, is evidence of a perfect correlation. Although coefficients should be interpreted within the clinical context, 0.20 was interpreted as poor agreement;
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:740–46 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org 743
Fig 4. A 9-year-old boy with complete aqueductal stenosis and neurofibromatosis type 1 (patient 21). A and B, Coronal T2-weighted MR image obtained 2 years ago shows no evidence of hydrocephalus (A), whereas a recent T1-weighted MR image shows a progressive hydrocephalus (B). C, Sagittal PC-MRI obtained at the level of the aqueduct shows absence of aqueductal flow (white arrow). Sagittal PC-MRI shows a flow representing the deep venous system in the posteroinferior part of the aqueduct (black arrow, C ). The pulsation secondary to the venous flow in the quadrigeminal cistern can mimic the aqueductal flow. D, Sagittal 3D-SPACE with VFAM MR image clearly demonstrates the venous structures located in the third ventricular outlet–the quadrigeminal cistern (black arrow). This image demonstrates a complete aqueductal stenosis (white arrow, D ). E and F, Axial thin-section (1 mm) reformatted images obtained from sagittal 3D-SPACE images (E ) show multiple hamartomas (arrows, F ).
0.21– 0.40, as fair agreement; 0.41– 0.60, as moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, as good agreement; and 0.81–1.00, as very good agree- ment.14 To determine the relationship among PC-MRI, SPACE, and consensus-based results, correlation analysis was performed and the Spearman correlation coefficient was also computed. The level of sta- tistically significant difference was P .05.
Demographic data, clinical findings, etiology of hydrocepha- lus, and MR imaging scores are summarized in Table 1. In all subjects of the control group, a normal aqueductal CSF flow was detected on both PC-MRI and SPACE MR images (grade 0) (Fig 1). Aqueductal width was within normal ranges in all control group subjects without evidence of intra- or periaque- ductal pathology.
Statistical analysis of the study population scores revealed an excellent correlation between 3D-SPACE and PC-MRI scores ( 0.828) (Table 2 and Figs 2– 4). Similarly, there was an excellent correlation between PC-MRI and consensus-
based scores (r 0.966 and P .001) and SPACE and con- sensus-based scores (r 1 and P .001).
Four patients underwent VPS, whereas 1 had endoscopic third ventriculostomy. In 2 of these 5 patients, early postoper- ative CT scans revealed regression of hydrocephalus, whereas the remaining 3 patients underwent clinical follow-up, or sur- gery was planned for them.
Diagnosis of AS and periaqueductal abnormalities by routine MR imaging is challenging for neuroradiologists.3 Routine MR imaging criteria for AS (such as anterior or inferior bulg- ing of the third ventricle and triventricular dilation) are usu- ally subjective and less reproducible without validated cutoff values.1-3 The criterion standard technique for the diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus and AS is ventriculographic stud- ies, and these studies are very invasive and difficult to perform in routine daily practice.6 CE-MRC is a less invasive morpho- logic and functional technique for diagnosis of obstructive
744 Algin AJNR 33 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org
Fig 5. Timing diagram of the 3D-SPACE with different flip angles (3D-SPACE with VFAM). The diagram shows 1 TR of the pulse sequence. The first line shows the variation in the heights of the radio-frequency pulses during the echo-train. Gs is the section-selection gradient, which varies to select different sections in k-space. Gk and Gr are the phase- encoding and readout gradients, respectively. The timing diagram was drawn by John P. Mugler III and modified with his permission.
hydrocephalus, and it includes intrathecal administration of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid, which is safe but not accepted worldwide.15-18 In addition to these tech- niques, PC-MRI and heavily T2-weighted (such as 3D-CISS) or thin-section T2-weighted sequences can be used as alterna- tives.3,6,16 However, these techniques have their own advan- tages and disadvantages.5,19,20 For instance, PC-MRI can pro- vide physiologic information about CSF flow; however, it might fail in case of complex flow or vascular pulsations.16 3D-CISS can give high anatomic resolution, but it cannot pro- vide physiologic information about the aqueductal flow.6,16 Moreover, in many patients with a prediagnosis of AS, re- peated further evaluation with MR imaging may needed, and this increases costs and delays the treatment.
3D-SPACE is a recently developed T2-weighted MR imag- ing technique that allows an all-in-1 evaluation of the cranium with a single image acquisition (Fig 5). With this flexible se- quence; T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton-attenuation, or FLAIR images can be obtained.20 The advantages of the 3D-SPACE sequence in evaluation of the spine, pelvis, and abdomen have been reported previously.8,12 3D-SPACE se- quence uses different flip angles, which enable a low specific absorption rate value, therefore obtaining good T2-weighted images.8-12 Additionally, thin-sectioned images with good spatial resolution can be obtained in a reasonable acquisition time by using parallel acquisition techniques.8
In the current study, we have developed a simpler and more robust approach with T2-weighted 3D-SPACE with VFAM for the diagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus and AS. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous report on the role of 3D-SPACE in AS. In our study, we showed that 3D-SPACE with VFAM could provide all the information about CSF flow dynamics with a single-station image acquisition. In this se- quence, restricted CSF proximal to the obstruction appeared hyperintense, and freely floating unrestricted CSF was ob- served as a hypointense signal intensity. 3D-SPACE with VFAM provides noninvasive evaluation of CSF hydrodynam- ics similar to that in PC-MRI. In addition, it can give all the morphologic information that can be obtained from other sequences in high resolution. Those features of 3D-SPACE are
a great advantages for evaluation of AS and obstructive hydro- cephalus. Moreover, the sequence can be applied in 3D; the achieved multiplanar reformatted images with high resolution will probably increase the comfort level for the radiologist during the image interpretation. The SPACE sequence with 3D acquisition can supply standardization of MR imaging protocol in patients with AS and/or obstructive hydrocepha- lus. Another advantage of 3D-SPACE is its capability to de- crease MR imaging examination time significantly. Usually T2-weighted and PC-MRI sequences are needed in multiple planes for the evaluation of hydrocephalus. However, 3D- SPACE could supply the same morphologic and physiologic information alone. This would shorten MR imaging examina- tion time by 10 minutes.
There were a few limitations in our study. First, we could not compare the results of 3D-SPACE sequence with a crite- rion standard ground truth because there was no existing non- invasive criterion standard test and the ethical rules did not allow us to use invasive tests in our study. Second, the observ- ers in our study were not blinded to the MR imaging sequence type during interpretation and comparison. Finally, our pa- tient population was relatively small; therefore, new large- scale studies are needed in this topic.
Diagnosing and defining the etiology of AS are extremely im- portant for accurate therapy planning for hydrocephalus. The 3D-SPACE sequence with VFAM can be used as an efficient single technique in the evaluation of the patients with a predi- agnosis of AS because it can supply morphologic as well as physiologic information. With this technique, one can evalu- ate patients with a prediagnosis of obstructive hydrocephalus in a shorter image-acquisition time and more accurately. 3D- SPACE with VFAM can be useful for optimizing and stan- dardizing the MR imaging protocol of patients with AS.
The authors thank Prof. Dr. Ergin Atalar, the director of Na- tional MR research center (UMRAM), for the opportunity he provided for 3T MR acquisitions and gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Halil Arslan, John P. Mugler III, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Volkan Acikel, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Karaoglanoglu, Prof. Dr. Ihsan Solaroglu, and Prof. Dr. Faik Ozveren, Dr. Evrim Oz- men, and Dr. Filiz Eryilmaz for their contributions.
1. Allan R, Chaseling R, Graf N, et al. Aqueduct stenosis-benign? J Clin Neurosci 2005;12:178 – 82
2. Tisell M. How should primary aqueductal stenosis in adults be treated? A review. Acta Neuro Scand 2005;111:143–53
3. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M. Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of the aqueductal stenosis. Neuroradiology 2010;52:99 –108
4. Sekerci Z, Akalan N, Kilic C, et al. Primary non-neoplastic aqueductal stenosis associated with Von Recklinghausen’s disease. Turk Neurosurg 1989;1:30 –33
5. Algin O. Role of complex hydrocephalus in unsuccessful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26:3– 4
6. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M. Phase-contrast MRI and 3D-CISS versus contrast-enhanced MR cisternography on the evaluation of spontaneous third ventriculostomy existence. J Neuroradiol 2010;38:98 –104
7. YadavYR,MukerjiG,PariharV,etal.Complexhydrocephalus(combination of communicating and obstructive type): an important cause of failed endo- scopic third ventriculostomy. BMC Res Notes 2009;2:137
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:740–46 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org 745
- Haystead CM, Dale BM, Merkle EM. N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Radiology 2008;246: 589 –95
- Mugler JP 3rd, Wald LL, Brookeman JR. T2-weighted 3D spin-echo train im- aging of the brain at 3Tesla: reduced power deposition using low flip-angle refocusing RF pulses. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scotland, UK. April 21–27, 2001
- BinkA,SchmittM,GaaJ,etal.Detectionoflesionsinmultiplesclerosisby2D FLAIR and single-slab 3D FLAIR sequences at 3.0 T: initial results. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1104 –10
- Mugler JP 3rd, Menzel MI, Horger W, et al. High-resolution, multi-contrast 3D imaging of the brain in 15 minutes. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Miami Beach, Florida. May 7–13, 2005
- ProsciaN,JaffeTA,NevilleAM,etal.MRIofthepelvisinwomen:3Dversus2D T2-weighted technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:254 –59
- Oto C, Ekim O, Algin O, et al. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and multi- planar reconstruction of the brain and its associated structures in pig. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2011;58:73–78
14. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991
15. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Gokalp G, et al. The contribution of 3D-CISS and con- trast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea. Br J Radiol 2010;83:225–32
16. Algin O, Hakyemez B, Gokalp G, et al. Phase-contrast cine MRI versus MR cisternography on the evaluation of the communication between intraven- tricular arachnoid cysts and neighbouring cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Neuro- radiology 2009;51:305–12
17. AlginO,HakyemezB,OcakogluG,etal.MRcisternography:isitusefulinthe diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of “good shunt responders”? Diagn Interv Radiol 2011;17:105–11
18. Algin O, Taskapilioglu O, Zan E, et al. Detection of CSF leaks with magnetic resonance imaging in intracranial hypotension syndrome. J Neuroradiol 2011; 38:175–77. Epub 2011 Jan 6
19. AlginO.RoleofaqueductalCSFstrokevolumeinidiopathicnormal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:E26 –27
20. Watanabe Y, Makidono A, Nakamura M, et al. 3D MR cisternography to iden- tify distal dural rings: comparison of 3D-CISS and 3D-SPACE sequences. Magn Reson Med Sci 2011;10:29 –32
746 Algin AJNR 33 Apr 2012 www.ajnr.org